Montag, 2. März 2015

Mechanism of Roundup Ready plants, Evaluation of Round-up and current situation



Why Round-up Ready plants are resistant to Glyphosate 

Glyphosate is the active agent in the herbicide Round-up from Monsanto. It is very effective because it inhibits the shikimate pathway enzyme EPSP-Synthase which is found in every plant.[1] End products of the Shikimate pathway are three Amino acids that are necessary for the protein synthesis beneath these there are also intermediates that are used for secondary metabolic compounds.[2] This means, that a plant dies if this synthesis way does not work. 


Chemical Structure of Glyphosate.[3]



Monsanto developed also a method to make plants resistant to their herbicide, this plants are called Round-up ready. With the soil bacteria Agrobacterium sp. strain CP4 can t-DNA from the bacterial Plasmid be transmitted into the Plant Genome, on this DNA is the CP4 ESPS-Synthase from another bacteria encoded, which is resistant against Glyphosate.[4] The function on a molecular level is based on the difference of one Amino acid in the EPSP Synthase, in the CP4 Form it is an Alanine and in the normal Form it is a Glycine. This conformation leads to a condensation of the bound Glyphosate, which has now a high energy level and with that no effect as an inhibitor.[1]



Advantages of Round-up ready Plants 

With Round-up ready plants pesticide applications can be reduced by 37% because there is only glyphosate necessary instead of several other chemicals which are partly much more toxic.[5]  In India the use of Round-up ready plants reduced the cases of pesticide poisoning drastically.[6]
Due to more effective pest control and as a result of it less loss of crop, farming gets more efficient. As a result of a broad literature research of different researches Klümper and Quaim quantify the increase of crop yield with genetically modified plants by 21%. [5]



Disadvantages of Round-up ready Plants 

The use of just a few round-up ready breeds all over the world is problematic because of resistance developments in pests and weeds. If such a resistance develop fast, there can be a huge loss in crop yields. A resistance can easy develop in an environment with a lot of glyphosate.[1] There are already resistant weeds that make the use of other pesticides necessary.[7]
Another controversy is the accumulation and toxicity of Glyphosate in Round-up ready plants. The plants seam to accumulate the pesticide and have a less healthy and nourishing composition.[8] But in this field a lot of different literature with contractionary statements can be found.



Current situation

Today they are six Round-up ready plants: Rape, Cotton, Maize, Soya Bean, Sugar Beet and Wheat. They represent the gross of the genetically modified (GM) plants which grows on 181 million hectares in 28 countries worldwide. 75% of these area is in the USA, Brazil and Argentina. There are oppositions and prohibitions against GM plants in many countries but the proportion on the total agriculture land increases steady since 1996, in 12 of 18 years with double-digit growth rates.[9] 
 
This graph shows the development of the area cultivated by GM plants in millions of hectares by country until 2008, the huge proportion of the USA, Argentina and Brazil is eye-catching.[10]



This map shows the legal state of GM plants around the world. But also in the green marked countries a lot of different restrictions exist, in some only scientific use is allowed.[11]



[1] Funke, T., Huijong, H., Healy-Fried, M.L., Schönbrunn, E. (2006). Molecular basis for the herbicide resistance of Roundup Ready crops. Proceeding of the national Academy of Science of the United States. 103(35), P. 13010-13015.

[2] Herrmann, K.L., Weaver, L.M. (1999).The Shikimate Pathway. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 50, P. 473-503.

[3] Wikimedia Commons: called up 02.03.2015 from: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Glyphosate.svg?uselang=de

[4] Padgette, S.R., Kolacz, K. H., Delannay, X., Re, D.B., LaVallee, B.J., Tinius, C. N.,  Rhodes, W. K., Otero, Y.I., Barry, G.F., Eichholtz, D.A., Peschke, V.M., Nida, D.L., Taylor N.B., Kishore G.M. (1995). Development, Identification, and Characterization of a Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean Line. Crop Sciences. 35(5), P. 1451-1461.

[5] Klümper, W., Qaim, M. (2014). Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops. PLoS ONE. 9(11), DOI 101371.

[6] Kouser, S., Qaim M. (2011). Impact of Bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in smallholder agriculture: A panel. Ecological Economics. 70(11), P. 2105-2113.

[7] Hartzler, B. (2008). Managing the Risk of Glyphosate Resistant Weeds. Iowa State University, Weed Science.

[8] Bøhna, T., Cuhraa, M., Traavika, T., Sandenc, M., Fagand, J., Primiceriob, R. (2014). Compositional differences in soybeans on the market: Glyphosate accumulates in Roundup Ready GM soybeans. Food Chemistry. 153, P. 207-215.

[9] James, C. (2014). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief No. 49. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.

[10] Wikimedia Commons: called up 02.03.2015 from:

[11] Wikimedia Commons: called up 02.03.2015 from: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gm_accept_map.png

6 Kommentare:

  1. Dear Stefan
    You wrote a good post and found many interesting scientific references. Good work
    It was a bit too bad that especially the first part of the post was quite difficult to read. Sometimes I had to guess what you meant exactly. Maybe for your next post, one of your group members could help you with your wording and grammar? It would be too bad, if information got lost due translation.....Thanks!
    best wishes
    Petra

    AntwortenLöschen
  2. Hi Stefan

    Good blog: I found it very informative, because you used different interesting sources. I especially liked that you mentioned the possible accumulation of glyphosate in the crops and the controversial debate around it. Doing the literature research for the blog I had the impression that every article that reported some possible negative aspect of glyphosate, as the one cited by you, was heavily attacked, got letters to the editor and often the study design was harshly criticised. There is some good article reflecting this phenomenon:

    http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090902/full/461027a.html

    In the advantage and current situation part you often wrote about GM crops in general and not about Roundup ready or herbicide-tolerant ones. Of course this is not wrong, as you mentioned HT crops are the most widely used GM crops.
    But sometimes it still makes sense to make the difference between herbicide-tolerant and insect-resistant GM crops : You wrote that pesticide application can be reduced by 37% when using RR crops. This number is actually only true for GM crops in general. The meta-analysis that you cited reported that the pesticide quantity was only decreased in IR GM crops. In HT ones there was averaged no significant reduction in the pesticide quantity. Only the pesticide costs were lower [5].

    Best regards
    Bettina

    AntwortenLöschen
    Antworten
    1. Hi Bettina

      Very interesting reference - thanks! I hadn't seen this article and I have been involved in this debate for a long time. It's really sad if not even scientists can discuss these issues in a constructive way....
      Petra

      Löschen
  3. Dear Stefan
    I like your description, which explains how Glyphosate works and where the resistance in the plants comes from.
    You pointed out that there is an on-going discussion about the toxicity and the impact on health. It is important to recognize that the opinions are widely spread, so it is quite good that you mentioned this in your blog.
    The sources you use are fine in general besides the graphs from Wikimedia. It would be advisable to follow the source Wikimedia is using and to check whether it is trustworthy and really scientific. However, to use diagrams and graphs is very helpful to support the reader’s comprehension.
    To sum up, your blog is very informative and offers a good overview about this topic, but you could try to make it more credible by using only scientific sources.
    Cheers
    Priska

    AntwortenLöschen
  4. Hi Stefan!

    You did a nice research about the use of glyphosate in RR-plants. You wrote that there are just a few round-up ready breeds all over the world, but I think the problem is that the weeds get resistant to glyphosate which is contained in all round-up Ready breeds. Anyway you did a great overview about the situation of GM-plants around the world. It’s impressive how the area that is cultivated by GM-plants increases since 1996, especially in the USA.

    Best regards,
    Gianna

    AntwortenLöschen
  5. Hi Stefan

    Your blog is well structured and has especially in the second part very good graphics, but they are both older than five years. I think in the last few years there have been changes.What I miss personal, not only in your blog, are the prospects for the future. For example GM plants are e these days also a big topic in the EU. Many politics fight for or against GM plants.

    Best regards

    Hans






































    I think in the last few years there have been changes

    AntwortenLöschen